Live Weight Uniformity on The Day-Old Chick of Indonesian Local Chickens

Yesita Vera Saraswati; Fatmawati Mustofa; Aprilianna Putri Zahara Nafsina Luvita  Sari; Heru Sasongko; Bambang Ariyadi; Dyah Maharani

doi:10.55230/mabjournal.v52i2.2599

Authors

Yesita Vera Saraswati Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Fatmawati Mustofa Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Aprilianna Putri Zahara Nafsina Luvita Sari Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Heru Sasongko Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Bambang Ariyadi Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Dyah Maharani
d.maharani@ugm.ac.id
Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

BS, DOC, live weight, local chicken, uniformity

Abstract

The uniformity of live weight in the early stage (DOC) is an indicator applied to evaluate the quality of brooding, raising, and growth management. This study aims to compare the live weight uniformity of DOC in three local breeds as a parental group, namely Merawang A and B (n:196), Murung Panggang (n:157), and KUB (n:416), as well as in five groups of Bulaksumur (BS) for crossbred group, namely BS-1 (n:136), BS-2 (n:76), BS-3 (n:106), BS-5 (n:81), BS-6 (n:164). The live weight data of DOC was obtained in Gunungkidul Regency under similar management. The results show that the BS groups had higher live weight (31.9 g ± 3.1) compared to Merawang A (24 g ± 3.1), Murung Panggang (28.2 g ± 2.3), and KUB (28.1 g ± 2.8). Furthermore, the live weight uniformity on the BS DOC averaged 71% across all groups, with the highest uniformity being BS-3 (87%). Murung Panggang had a higher live weight uniformity (82%) compared to Merawang A and B (42%, 64%) and KUB (63%). The average coefficient variance was less than 10%, except for Merawang A and BS-2 with 13.09% and 11.35%, respectively. In conclusion, the DOC of the crossbred (BS) was more uniform than its parental groups. However, to distinguish the significantly different in the chicken live weight in early stage, further analysis needs to be conducted in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abbas, S.A., Elseid, A.A.G. & Ahmed, M.K.A. 2010. Effect of body weight uniformity on the productivity of broiler breeder hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(3): 225-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.225.230

Augusto, M.A., Santos, T.G., Campos, E.J., Garcia, H.C. & Almeida, F.R.C.L.D. 2019. Effects of incubation period and fasting time on the duodenum morphology from one-day-old commercial broiler chicks: An histomorphometrical study. Approaches in Poultry, Dairy & Veterinary Sciences, 5(5): 495-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31031/APDV.2019.05.000625

Begna, T. 2021. Combining ability and heterosis in plant improvement. Open Journal of Plant Science. 6(1): 108-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17352/ojps.000043

Darwati, S. Sumantri, C. & Pratiwanggana, A.T. 2015. Production performance between F1 commercial meat type x kampung chicken and kampung chicken x commercial meat type at 0-12 weeks. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan, 3(2): 72-78.

Darwati, S., Nurcahya, H., Afnan, R., Maulana, V.S. & Rohamtullah, P. 2018. Performance of G1 Merawang-Arab crossing growth at 1-12 weeks age. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan, 6(2): 67-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jipthp.6.2.67-72

Fulla, S. 2022. Review on potential and impact of chicken crossbreeding in developing countries. World Scientific News, 166: 28-4.

Gueye, E.H.F. 1998. Village and meat production in Africa. World's Poultry Science Journal, 54(1): 82-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19980007

Hughes, R.J., Heberle, N., Barekatain, R., Edwards, N.M. & Hynd, P.I. 2017. Flock Uniformity-is it important, and how is it assessed? In: Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium at Sydney, Australia, pp. 93-95.

Hughes, R.J. & Wilkinson, S.J. 2021. Flock uniformity and sample size requirements for accurate prediction of live weight during mixed-sex rearing of chickens. Online Agricultural Community. en.engormix.com. (accessed 31.8.21).

Junnu, S. & Pohuang, T. 2019. Chick quality and one-day-old chick assessment at the hatchery. Khon Kaen University Veterinary Journal, 29: 117-128.

Kosba, M.A., Zewil, H.S., Ahmed, M.H., Shabara, S.M. & Debes, A.A. 2010. Selection for uniformity in Alexandria local chickens: 2. Correlated response for productive and reproductive traits. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, 30(1): 114-136.

Lapihu, Y.L., Telupere, F.M.S. & Sutedjo, H. 2019. Kajian fenotip dan genetik performa pertumbuhan dari persilangan ayam lokal dengan ayam layer petelur Isa Brown. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 14(3): 298-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.14.3.298-305

Liswaniso, S., Ning, Q.I.N., Xuesong, S.H.A.N., Chimbaka, I.M., Xue, S.U.N., & Rifu, X.U. 2020. Quality characteristics, phenotypic correlations and principal component analysis of indigenous free range chicken eggs in Lusaka, Zambia. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 29–35.

Masito, M., Putra, A.R.S. & Andarwati, Siti. 2022. The effect of Kampung Unggul Balitbangtan (KUB) chicken innovation characteristics toward the development of farmers perceptions in South Sumatra. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1001: 012027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1001/1/012027

Manyelo, T.G., Selaledi, L., Hassan, Z.M. & Mabelebele, M. 2020. local chicken breeds of Africa: Their description, uses and conservation methods. Animals, 10(12): 2257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122257

Mengesha, M. 2012. Indigenous chicken production and the innate characteristics. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 6: 56–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2012.56.64

Mustofa, F., Sari, A.P.Z.N.L., Suryanto, E., Maharani, D., Agus, A., Widodo, S. Putra, A.A. & Sasongko, H. 2021. The body weight performance of indigenous Indonesian chickens in the grower phase. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 888: 012010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/888/1/012010

Neto, R.M., Surek, D., da Rocha, C., Dahlke, F. & Maiorka, A. 2013. The effect of grouping one-day-old chicks by body weight on the uniformity of broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 22(2): 245-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00636

Nuraini, Hidayat, Z., Puspito, S. & Suyatno. 2021. Characteristics and growth of Merawang chicken in Bangka Belitung under traditional farming system. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 807: 032051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032051

Padhi, M. 2016. Importance of indigenous breeds of chicken for rural economy and their improvements for higher production performance. Review Article. Academic Eds, Sveinn Are Hanssen Hindawi. Publishing Corporation Scientifica, p. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2604685

Rowianti, W.O., Junaedi & Suparman. 2021. Pertumbuhan bobot badan ayam hasil persilangan ayam kampung dengan Ayam Bangkok. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Peternakan, 3(1): 8-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31605/jstp.v3i1.1300

Rubianti, A., Achadri, Y., Kote, M., Ratnawaty, S. & Matitaputty, P. 2021. The effect of environmental factors on the productivity of Kampung Unggul Balitbangtan (KUB) chicken in Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 807: 032045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032045

Sartika, T. 2018. Laporan akhir potensi produktivitas ayam Merawang. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan, Bogor.

Sutopo, Kurnianto, E., Setiatin, E.T., Lestari, D.A., Setiaji, A., Suryawijaya, A. & Samsudewa, D. 2021. Growth evaluation of native chicken on different type of hen body weight. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 16(4): 292-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.16.4.292-296

Vasdal, G., Granquist, E.G., Skjerve, E., de Jong, I.C., Berg, C., Michel, V. & Moe, R.O. 2019. Animal well-being and behavior associations between carcass weight uniformity and production measures on farms and slaughter in commercial broiler flocks. Journal of Poultry Science, 98(10): 4261-4268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez252

Wardi, Dewi, M., Cahyono, A. & Ishak, A.B.L. 2019. Performance of KUB chickens on breeding center in Sigi district central Sulawesi province. In: Proceeding of Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner, pp. 710-717.

Wondmeneh, E. 2015. Genetic improvement in indigenous chicken of Ethiopia (PhD). Wageningen University, Netherlands.

Zen, A.A., Ondho, Y.S. & Sutiyono. 2020. Seleksi pejantan ayam kampung berdasarkan breeding value terhadap gerak massa, abnormalitas dan motilitas spermatozoa. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 15(3): 339-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.15.3.339-347