Assessment of Tannase Producer Acinetobacter nosocomialis (MT540255) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (GU197531) Isolated from Ruminant Gut Fluid

https://doi.org/10.55230/mabjournal.v55i2.3551

Authors

  • Nur Farah Syuhada Mohd Zaki Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nurul Nadiah Abdul Aziz Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Taufiq Mat Jalil Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nurul Aili Zakaria Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia; Human Genetics and Biochemistry Research Group (Hugeb), Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-3891

Keywords:

antimicrobial resistance, Acinetobacter strain, Characterization, ruminal gut, Staphylococcus strain, Tannase

Abstract

Excessive tannin intake in ruminant diets adversely affects feed palatability and nutrient digestibility; however, microbial tannases offer an effective biological approach to tannin degradation. In this study, two previously identified tannase-producing bacterial strains isolated from ruminant gut fluid -- Acinetobacter nosocomialis (MT540255) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (GU197531) -- were evaluated for the optimization of physicochemical parameters affecting tannase activity using tannic acid, while assessing their antibiotic resistance profiles and the synergistic antimicrobial activity of crude tannase extracts. Both strains showed morphological and biochemical characteristics consistent with those reported for their respective genera. A. nosocomialis (MT540255) exhibited optimal tannase activity at pH 6, 40°C, and 1.6% substrate concentration for 105 min, resulting in a 1.23-fold increase to 42.51 U/mL. In contrast, S. saprophyticus (GU197531) reached its peak activity at pH 10, 50°C, and 1.8% substrate concentration for 45 min, yielding a 1.93-fold increase to 48.43 U/mL. Overall, optimization of physicochemical conditions enhanced tannase activity in both strains, with pH emerging as a key contributing factor for A. nosocomialis (MT540255), while S. saprophyticus (GU197531) showed additional strong responsiveness to pH and substrate concentration. A. nosocomialis (MT540255) and S. saprophyticus (GU197531) were found to be resistant to six and four of the ten antibiotics tested for antibiotic susceptibility, respectively. Notably, crude tannase from both strains showed significant synergistic effects (p<0.05) when combined with streptomycin. These findings suggest the potential application of tannase-producing bacteria from ruminant gut fluid in improving the nutritional quality of ruminant feed through tannin degradation, while offering synergistic benefits in antimicrobial applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Basatian-Tashkan, B., Niakan, M., Khaledi, M., Afkhami, H., Sameni, F. & Bakhti, S. 2020. Antibiotic resistance assessment of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Tehran hospitals due to the presence of efflux pumps encoding genes (adeA and adeS genes) by molecular method. BMC Research Notes, 13(1): 543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05387-6

Abdulshaheed, A.A., Hanafiah, M.M. & Muslim, S.N. 2023. Screening and optimization of a novel gallic acid and tannase production under semi quantitative and quantitative methods. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1167(1): 012046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1167/1/012046

Aharwar, A. & Parihar, D.K. 2018. Tannases: Production, properties, applications. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 15: 322-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.07.005

Al-Mraai, S.T.Y., Al-Fekaiki, D.F. & Al-Manhel, A.J.A. 2019. Purification and characterization of tannase from the local isolate of Aspergillus niger. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 7(1): 29-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2019.70106

Balakrishnan, A., Kanchinadham, S.B.K. & Kalyanaraman, C. 2021. Studies on the effect of bacterial tannase supplementation to biodegradation of tannins in tannery wastewater. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 60(47): 16854-16863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02987

Bashir, A., Mujahid, T.Y. & Jehan, N. 2007. Antibiotic resistance profile: Isolation and characterization of clinical isolates of staphylococci from patients with community-acquired skin infections. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 20(4): 299-304.

Beniwal, V., Kumar, R., Kumari, A. & Chhokar, V. 2014. Microbial production of tannase. Microbes in the Service of Mankind, pp. 463-488.

Besharati, M., Maggiolino, A., Palangi, V., Kaya, A., Jabbar, M., Eseceli, H., De Palo, P. & Lorenzo, J.M. 2022. Tannin in ruminant nutrition. Molecules, 27(23): 8273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238273

Borges, A., Ferreira, C., Saavedra, M.J. & Simões, M. 2013. Antibacterial activity and mode of action of ferulic and gallic acids against pathogenic bacteria. Microbial Drug Resistance, 19(4): 256-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2012.0244

Buchmann, D., Schultze, N., Borchardt, J., Böttcher, I., Schaufler, K. & Guenther, S. 2022. Synergistic antimicrobial activities of epigallocatechin gallate, myricetin, daidzein, gallic acid, epicatechin, 3-hydroxy-6-methoxyflavone and genistein combined with antibiotics against ESKAPE pathogens. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 132(2): 949-963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15253

Cavalcanti, R.M.F., Jorge, J.A. & Guimarães, L.H.S. 2018. Characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus CAS-21 tannase with potential for propyl gallate synthesis and treatment of tannery effluent from leather industry. 3 Biotech, 8: 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1294-z

Chaitanyakumar, A. & Anbalagan, M. 2016. Expression, purification and immobilization of tannase from Staphylococcus lugdunensis MTCC 3614. AMB Express, 6: 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0261-5

Chávez-González, M., Rodríguez-Durán, L.V., Balagurusamy, N., Prado-Barragán, A., Rodríguez, R., Contreras, J.C. & Aguilar, C.N. 2012. Biotechnological advances and challenges of tannase: An overview. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5(2): 445-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0608-5

Cipriano-Salazar, M., Rojas-Hernández, S., Olivares-Pérez, J., Jiménez-Guillén, R., Cruz-Lagunas, B., Camacho-Díaz, L.M. & Ugbogu, A.E. 2018. Antibacterial activities of tannic acid against isolated ruminal bacteria from sheep. Microbial Pathogenesis, 117: 255-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.01.045

Dhiman, S., Mukherjee, G., Kumar, A. & Majumdar, R.S. 2021. Enhanced production of tannase through RSM by Bacillus haynesii SSRY4 MN031245 under submerged fermentation. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 80: 675-680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v80i08.39264

Dusane, D.H., O'May, C. & Tufenkji, N. 2015. Effect of tannic and gallic acids alone or in combination with carbenicillin or tetracycline on Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 growth, motility, and biofilm formation. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 61(7): 487-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2015-0101

Eed, J. 2013. Factors affecting enzyme activity. ESSAI, 10.

Farhan, M., Hasani, I.W., Khafaga, D.S., Ragab, W.M., Ahmed Kazi, R.N., Aatif, M. & Fahim, Y.A. 2025. Enzymes as catalysts in industrial biocatalysis: Advances in engineering, applications, and sustainable integration. Catalysts, 15(9): 891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15090891

Fitsum, S., Gebreyohannes, G. & Sbhatu, D.B. 2025. Bioactive compounds in fermented foods: Health benefits, safety, and future perspectives. Applied Food Research, 101097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.101097

Fu, R., Han, L., Li, Q., Li, Z., Dai, Y. & Leng, J. 2025. Studies on the concerted interaction of microbes in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants on lignocellulose and its degradation mechanism. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16: 1554271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1554271

Gheibipour, M., Ghiasi, S.E., Bashtani, M., Torbati, M.B.M. & Motamedi, H. 2022. The potential of tannin degrading bacteria isolated from rumen of Iranian Urial ram as silage additives. Bioresource Technology Reports, 18: 101024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101024

Govindarajan, R.K., Krishnamurthy, M., Neelamegam, R., Shyu, D.J., Muthukalingan, K. & Nagarajan, K. 2019. Purification, structural characterization and biotechnological potential of tannase enzyme produced by Enterobacter cloacae strain 41. Process Biochemistry, 77: 37-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.10.013

Govindarajan, R.K., Mathivanan, K., Khanongnuch, C., Srinivasan, R., Unban, K. & Deepak, A.C. 2021. Tannin acyl-hydrolase production by Bacillus subtilis KMS2-2: Purification, characterization, and cytotoxicity studies. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 33(3): 101359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101359

Govindarajan, R.K., Seemaisamy, R., Neelamegam, R., Muthukalingan, K. & Nagarajan, K. 2016. Isolation and characterization of tannase producing bacteria from the gut of Gryllotalpa krishnani. The Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 6(2): 813.

Hassan, Z.M., Manyelo, T.G., Selaledi, L. & Mabelebele, M. 2020. The effects of tannins in monogastric animals with special reference to alternative feed ingredients. Molecules, 25: 4680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204680

Hidayathulla, S., Shahat, A.A., Alsaid, M.S. & Al-Mishari, A.A. 2018. Optimization of physicochemical parameters of tannase post-purification and its versatile bioactivity. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(12): fny051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny051

Hiura, T., Hashidoko, Y., Kobayashi, Y. & Tahara, S. 2010. Effective degradation of tannic acid by immobilized rumen microbes of a Sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) in winter. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 155(1): 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.09.015

Hossain, M.A., Park, H.C., Lee, K.J., Park, S.W., Park, S.C. & Kang, J. 2020. In vitro synergistic potentials of novel antibacterial combination therapies against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. BMC Microbiology, 20: 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01810-x

Ire, F.S. & Nwanguma, A.C. 2020. Comparative evaluation on tannase production by Lasiodiplodia plurivora ACN-10 under submerged fermentation (SmF) and solid-state fermentation (SSF). Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Bioresource Technology, 6(1): 39-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajb2t/2020/v6i130074

Isah, D., Shugaba, A. & Milala, M.A. 2017. Studies on the production of tannase by Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Sciences and Multidisciplinary Research, 9(2).

Jana, A., Adak, A., Haider, S.K., Das, A., Paul, T., Mondal, K.C. & Mohapatra, P.K.D. 2015. A new strategy for improvement of tamarind seed based chicken diet after microbial detannification and assessment of its safety aspects. Acta Biologica Szegediensis, 59(1): 1-9.

Jebur, H.A. 2020. Optimization of production and partial purification of tannase from local isolate of Bacillus licheniformis HJ2020 MT14171. Plant Archives, 20(2): 2963-2968.

Kadigi, J.H., Muzzo, B.I. & Schreiber, S. 2024. Potential benefits of tannins on ruminant health, production and environmental sustainability. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, 16: 13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2024/v16i101552

Kang, J., Liu, L., Liu, M., Wu, X. & Li, J. 2018. Antibacterial activity of gallic acid against Shigella flexneri and its effect on biofilm formation by repressing mdoH gene expression. Food Control, 94: 147-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.011

Kumar, M., Rajesh, V.S. & Salar, R.K. 2019. Upgradation of tannase production by Klebsiella pneumoniae KP715242 through heat, UV, NTG and MMS induced mutagenesis for enhanced tannase activity. An International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal For Rapid Publication, 114.

Leangnim, N., Unban, K., Thangsunan, P., Tateing, S., Khanongnuch, C. & Kanpiengjai, A. 2023. Ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic improvement of polyphenol content, antioxidant potential, and in vitro inhibitory effect on digestive enzymes of Miang extracts. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 94: 106351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106351

Lu, L., Zhao, Y., Yi, G., Li, M., Liao, L., Yang, C. & Cheng, Q. 2021. Quinic acid: A potential antibiofilm agent against clinical resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chinese Medicine, 16(1): 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-021-00481-8

Manchanda, V., Sanchaita, S. & Singh, N.P. 2010. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, 2(3): 291-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-777X.68538

Mayer, F. 2022. Tannins: natural plant-derived polyhydroxy phenolic compounds with potential for biotechnological and biomedical applications. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2: 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53346/wjbpr.2022.2.1.0127

Milligan, E.G., Calarco, J., Davis, B.C., Keenum, I.M., Liguori, K., Pruden, A. & Harwood, V.J. 2023. A systematic review of culture-based methods for monitoring antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, and Pseudomonas as environmentally relevant pathogens in wastewater and surface water. Current Environmental Health Reports, 10(2): 154-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-023-00393-9

Mohammadabadi, T., Gheibipour, M., Motamedi, H., Chaji, M. & Abbas, B.A. 2021. Isolation and identification of tannin-degrading bacteria from deer gut and potency for improving nutritional value of tannin rich plants. Iranian Veterinary Journal, 17(1).

Mohammed, Y.H.I. 2016. Isolation and characterization of tannic acid hydrolysing bacteria from soil. Biochemistry & Analytical Biochemistry, 5: 254-560.

Mohapatra, P.K.D., Biswas, I., Mondal, K.C. & Pati, B.R. 2020. Concomitant yield optimization of tannase and gallic acid by Bacillus licheniformis KBR6 through submerged fermentation: An industrial approach. Acta Biologica Szegediensis, 64(2): 151-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14232/abs.2020.2.151-158

Muslim, S.N., Mohammed, A.N., Khazaal, S.S., Salman, B.K., AL-Kadmy, I.M., Muslim, S.N. & Jasim, R.A. 2017. Improvement of antibacterial activity for ceftazidime by partially purified tannase from Penicillium expansum. International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering, 11(7).

Patel, J.N., Parmar, F.A. & Upasani, V.N. 2022. Screening of microorganisms for hydrolyases with commercial potential. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 13(1): 092-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.13.1.0751

Patil, D.B., Das, S.K., Das Mohapatra, P.K. & Nag, A. 2011. Physico-chemical studies and optimization of gallic acid production from the seed coat of Terminalia belerica Roxb. Annals of Microbiology, 61: 649-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0185-2

Rajamanickam, K., Yang, J. & Sakharkar, M.K. 2019. Gallic acid potentiates the antimicrobial activity of tulathromycin against two key bovine respiratory disease (BRD) causing-pathogens. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9: 1486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01486

Selvaraj, S., Amaral, J.M. & Murty, V.R. 2022. Kinetics and antimicrobial activity of gallic acid by novel bacterial co-culture system using Taguchi's method and submerged fermentation. Archives of Microbiology, 204: 584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03168-2

Shakir, H.A., Javed, I., Irfan, M., Ali, S., Khan, M., Qazi, J.I. & Yousaf, M.A. 2022. Tannase production from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in submerged fermentation through response surface methodology. Biological Sciences-PJSIR, 65(2): 95-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52763/PJSIR.BIOL.SCI.65.2.2022.95.103

Srivastava, A. & Kar, R. 2009. Characterization and application of tannase produced by Aspergillus niger ITCC 6514.07 on pomegranate rind. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 40: 782-789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822009000400008

Suhaimi, M.S., Zailani, F.A., Mohd Zaki, N.F.S., Aris, F., Mat Jalil, M.T. & Zakaria, N.A. 2024. Isolation and identification of tannin-degrading bacteria from goat feces, ruminal fluid, and rumen gut. Malaysian Applied Biology, 53(3): 23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55230/mabjournal.v53i3.2999

Tahmourespour, A., Tabatabaee, N., Khalkhali, H. & Amini, I. 2016. Tannic acid degradation by Klebsiella strains isolated from goat feces. Iranian Journal of Microbiology, 8(1): 14.

Teron, L., Rajgadia, N., Dayana, A.T., Dhrithi, P.M., Nomuk, K. & Sharadamma, N. 2021. Production of tannin acyl hydrolase and its purification from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications, 14(3): 1173-1181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/14.3.41

Torimiro, N. & Torimiro, S.E.A. 2012. Antibiotic resistance profile in community-associated Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a Nigerian peri-urban community. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(94): 16071-16076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.2397

Tork, S.E. 2020. Biodegradation of tannins from polluted sources using natural enzymes. Kuwait Journal of Science, 47(4).

Tripathi, A.D., Sharma, A.B.L. & Lakshmi, B. 2016. Study on tannase producing Bacillus megaterium isolated from tannery effluent. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences, 3(7): 28-35.

Unban, K., Kodchasee, P., Shetty, K. & Khanongnuch, C. 2020. Tannin-tolerant and extracellular tannase producing Bacillus isolated from traditional fermented tea leaves and their probiotic functional properties. Foods, 9(4): 490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9040490

Vandenplas, Y. & Devreker, T. 2019. Functional constipation in children. Jornal de Pediatria, 95: 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2018.02.005

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

Mohd Zaki, N. F. S., Abdul Aziz, N. N., Mat Jalil, M. T., & Zakaria, N. A. (2026). Assessment of Tannase Producer Acinetobacter nosocomialis (MT540255) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (GU197531) Isolated from Ruminant Gut Fluid. Malaysian Applied Biology, 55(2), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.55230/mabjournal.v55i2.3551

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)